Wilkening Consulting
  • Services
    • Annual Survey of Museum-Goers
    • Philosophy
    • Resources
    • Annual Survey Methodology
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • About Us
    • In the media
    • Annual Survey Respondent Information
    • Data Privacy
  • Data Stories
    • Curiosity Resources
  • Services
    • Annual Survey of Museum-Goers
    • Philosophy
    • Resources
    • Annual Survey Methodology
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • About Us
    • In the media
    • Annual Survey Respondent Information
    • Data Privacy
  • Data Stories
    • Curiosity Resources
Picture
As the majority of research is now released via infographic, The Data Museum is currently on long-term hiatus. These archives will be maintained on the Wilkening Consulting website for the foreseeable future.

For the latest research findings, please visit the Data Stories section of the Wilkening Consulting website.

Museums and Family Time

8/31/2017

 
Picture
In my 2017 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers, I asked respondents to consider the value of museums in their life. Family time came up for parents, with comments like this one:

  • "[The value of museums is] mainly quality time between parents and children."

​Indeed, when asked directly why they visit, nearly half of parents chose family time (among an array of options; more than one answer could be chosen). That makes them about 50% more likely to cite this than grandparents, indicating family time primarily seems to play out as parents/primary caregivers and children, but not extended family as much. Not totally, but primarily.

About a third of young adults without children also chose family time as a primary reason for visiting museums, and their comments indicate that they enjoy visiting them with various family members, but primarily their spouses or significant others (with some saying museums helped them get to know future spouses better).

​Adults over age 60 are the least likely to cite family time; only one in five women, and only one in six men. As Americans age, however, they need social outlets to maintain long-term health and wellness. My data suggests museums are under-performing in this role (for more, see my review of Creative Health on The Curated Bookshelf). 


​
A note about fielding research.
I hold dear the idea that research for the field, about the field, should be shared with the field. But that only works when museums work together to make it possible. Since individual museums are needed to field this work, the survey also benefits participating museums on an individual level by providing benchmark data on visitation rates, motivations, attitudes and preferences, and demographic questions … all of which can then be tracked over time in the future. Participating museums are also allowed to add 1 - 2 custom questions specific to their needs. 

Which means if you value this research,  want more of it in the coming years, and want to track your own museum's progress over time, please support this work by enrolling your museum in the 2018 Annual Survey of Museum Goers. The fee for 2018 is only $1,000 per museum. 

​The questions for this survey have been inspired by ongoing conversations within the museum field (who does/does not go to museums, why they do/do not visit, and what that means for communities) and ongoing research in the fields of education and psychology around lifelong learning and intrinsic motivation. In particular, this question is similar to versions fielded by, among other organizations, the Smithsonian's Office of Policy and Analysis, the Lithuanian Ministry of Culture, Visitors Count!, etc.

Young Adult Museum-Goers: Enthusiastic, but I sure do wish there were more of them …

8/29/2017

 
Picture
I'll be honest with you. When it comes to young adults (under 40) without children, the findings from my 2017 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers didn't surprise me. I feel like it is stuff we all already know.

It's pretty logical, really. Young adults are less likely to be as connected to museums as families with young children and older adults. This isn't the same thing as saying less likely to visit (in fact, my work with AAM's Museums and America 2017 research indicates they are more likely to visit than older adults). But they are less likely to be members, to receive communications from museums directly … and less likely to respond to surveys of museum-goers.
Which means that the ones who do respond? They are pretty big museum fans. There just are not that many of them.

The data bears this out. Young adults without children comprised only 5% of the overall sample. Hardly representative of their share of the total population.

But wow, that 5% is probably the most enthusiastic museum-goer out there. They are:

  • The most intrinsically-motivated segment of museum-goers. They love to learn, and museums are great for that.
  • The most engaged with the content, most likely to think museums are fun, most curious, and most likely to think museums help people in their community, as this young adult shared:
    • "I think [museums] are a great venue for learning new knowledge, hosting events, and serving as a pillar in community life and culture. Personally, museums have and continue to make me question different aspects of the world around me. For that constant curiosity, I am forever grateful."
  • Extrinsically motivated as well. Museums provide respite in their busy lives, and places for social connection. Or both, as this young adult shared:
    • "Life is so hectic and busy these days I feel I do not spend nearly enough time with loved ones and visiting a museum for a day is an awesome experience and memory with my family and friends." 

​What makes this group so enthusiastic? Well, it seems to come from their childhoods. They are the most likely segment to have been raised in a college-educated household, and we know what that means for household likelihood to visit. This was borne out by their open-ended responses about the value of museums, which speak to both their childhoods and the high value they place on museums today:
  • "As a child from a low income rural family, visiting museums aided and filled in gaps in my education and provided me with rare opportunities I would not have gotten otherwise. They opened my eyes to a world outside, and a world of possibilities I'd have never found out about." 
  • "Museums have always held an important role in my life. Museums make science and history visual for people of all ages, stimulating interest and increasing understanding of important concepts. I still remember scientific exhibits that engaged me as a child, and as an adult I continue to want to learn about those subjects."

Yet there are challenges with this audience. First, how few responded in the first place. Of course that's an issue. But there is more. Despite being the most intrinsically-motivated segment, and high levels of engagement, they are the least likely to be a member or donor, and the least likely to think museums are charity. Clearly, membership doesn't work for them the way it is currently structured.  Can we create a membership option that makes more sense for them? And in a way that opens the door to future giving as well?

And they admit they do not have strong connections to their community. Far lower levels of connection. Despite the fact that they, on average, have more concerns about their community than any other segment. In particular, their top community concern is that people don't know their neighbors, followed by a loss of civility/more polarization. NO ONE felt stronger about these community challenges than young adults without children.

Which presents us with a pretty fantastic opportunity, if you think about it. How do we, as museums, help these young adults develop connections with their communities? Their neighbors? The data indicates that connections do tend to happen when individuals become parents. But many are choosing to delay parenthood until their 30s, while others are choosing to never have children at all. What then? Can museums help? How? And by helping young adults connect with their communities more deeply, can we also expand and deepen our connection with young adults? Which brings us to a question about community engagement yielding museum engagement, and vice versa, which I'll come back to in several weeks. Stay tuned.


A note about fielding research. I hold dear the idea that research for the field, about the field, should be shared with the field. But that only works when museums work together to make it possible. Since individual museums are needed to field this work, the survey also benefits participating museums on an individual level by providing benchmark data on visitation rates, motivations, attitudes and preferences, and demographic questions … all of which can then be tracked over time in the future. Participating museums are also allowed to add 1 - 2 custom questions specific to their needs.
 
Which means if you value this research,  want more of it in the coming years, and want to track your own museum's progress over time, please support this work by enrolling your museum in the 2018 Annual Survey of Museum Goers. The fee for 2018 is only $1,000 per museum. 


The questions for this survey have been inspired by ongoing conversations within the museum field (who does/does not go to museums, why they do/do not visit, and what that means for communities) and ongoing research in the fields of education and psychology around lifelong learning and intrinsic motivation.

Young Adults and Social Nature of Museums

8/24/2017

 
Picture
  • "Museums are the places I go to recharge, seek inspiration, learn, explore, and find beauty.  I often go with friends to enjoy their take on pieces I sometimes did not notice before or to have a different point of view on a piece I already love.  We chat.  We find something we love or hate together. We often imagine ourselves in other places and times."  - young adult museum-goer from 2017 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers​

And with that, I really don't have anything to add! (Though to be honest, I'm more surprised it isn't a bigger motivator for older adults, especially women.)


A note about fielding research. I hold dear the idea that research for the field, about the field, should be shared with the field. But that only works when museums work together to make it possible. Since individual museums are needed to field this work, the survey also benefits participating museums on an individual level by providing benchmark data on visitation rates, motivations, attitudes and preferences, and demographic questions … all of which can then be tracked over time in the future. Participating museums are also allowed to add 1 - 2 custom questions specific to their needs. 

Which means if you value this research,  want more of it in the coming years, and want to track your own museum's progress over time, please support this work by enrolling your museum in the 2018 Annual Survey of Museum Goers. The fee for 2018 is only $1,000 per museum. 


The questions for this survey have been inspired by ongoing conversations within the museum field (who does/does not go to museums, why they do/do not visit, and what that means for communities) and ongoing research in the fields of education and psychology around lifelong learning and intrinsic motivation. In particular, this question is similar to versions fielded by, among other organizations, the Smithsonian's Office of Policy and Analysis, the Lithuanian Ministry of Culture, Visitors Count!, etc.


Value of Museums, part IV: Understanding and Social Justice

8/21/2017

 
  • "I wish I had been exposed sooner to modern, relevant history and the ways that museums partner with activists sooner. Museums have given me reasons for the way the world is and inspired me to change it. To me museums matter the most when they make connections with people today and present themselves as places to build community and meaning" -  survey respondent, 2017 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers

Understanding. Empathy. Tolerance. Museums have the capacity to connect us to humanity. To make us consider different viewpoints. Become aware of different life experiences. To not fear "the other" so much. To be compassionate.

In my opinion, these are some of the most important impacts museums have in our society. Our ability to open individuals up to caring about others. And after working in this field for 20 years, I know many of you feel likewise.

Happily, when I asked regular museum-goers in the 2017 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers to share with me the value of museums in their life, 21% were able to articulate, and convey to me, similar feelings. That museums had made them more open-minded. More accepting. And better able to navigate a complicated world because of their experiences in museums. (Since this was from coding of an open-ended question, 21% is a lot.)

But this impact wasn't consistent among museum-goers. While a quarter of the most intrinsically motivated museum-goers spoke of these themes (as well as a quarter of young adults without children), only a tenth of parents of young children (10 and younger) said likewise. But then, as I'll share in a few weeks, that is the most extrinsically motivated segment of museum-goers.

So it seems that intrinsically-motivated learners care more about these goals than, I suspect, the more extrinsically-motivated broader population. Which makes what I am about to share make much more sense, as much as I don't like the results.

Preparing for two pending projects dealing with institutionalized racism and LGBTQ history, I fielded test questions asking the broader population about the appropriateness of museums sharing these histories. 
Picture
A third of respondents said yes, unambiguously when it came to the LGBTQ history of a historic site. A history of institutionalized racism in a community was more complicated, with a third saying yes, but some of the respondents equivocating more, saying "carefully." ("Carefully" may have seen as a "safe" response when they didn't really want to say "yes, absolutely." Thus, it could really mean a "no.")

But that means that nearly two-thirds of respondents said, effectively, "no." Two thirds. That museums should not be tackling these issues. It pains me that not only was I not surprised at this finding, but that I expected it. Though I will confess I was surprised that the LGBTQ approval was more definitive than that of institutionalized racism.

Given how museum-goers, overall, responded, I suspect they are much more likely to fall in the "yes, absolutely" camp than non-visitors. Museums likely are not running much risk of turning off most of their core audiences (some perhaps, but not most, as I shared in my last research release).

Yet if we are working to expand our reach to broader audiences, working on social justice issues may turn off those very same new audiences. It's a bit of a Catch-22, as doing it appears to mean preaching to the choir, while not doing it is morally wrong.

But putting numbers and data to the question … it helps. It helps because it means we are not going into these areas of work blindly. We are better prepared for challenges. For friction. We can have more confidence in doing social justice work, while also respond more quickly to criticisms.

As I mentally prepare for these projects (pending funding), I'm considering ways that I can probe that 2/3 of the population more closely. What questions do I need to ask to understand the why behind their answers. What life experiences are they coming from that make them say "no?" And what would it take to change their minds (realizing we are realistically only going to change some of them)?

And by pushing social justice issues more in our work, will we also open up new audiences as well? I suspect yes … and in ways that may make our work more meaningful to more people.



A note about fielding research. I hold dear the idea that research for the field, about the field, should be shared with the field. But that only works when museums work together to make it possible. Since individual museums are needed to field this work, the survey also benefits participating museums on an individual level by providing benchmark data on visitation rates, motivations, attitudes and preferences, and demographic questions … all of which can then be tracked over time in the future. Participating museums are also allowed to add 1 - 2 custom questions specific to their needs. 

Which means if you value this research,  want more of it in the coming years, and want to track your own museum's progress over time, please support this work by enrolling your museum in the 2018 Annual Survey of Museum Goers. The fee for 2018 is only $1,000 per museum. 



The questions for this survey have been inspired by ongoing conversations within the museum field (who does/does not go to museums, why they do/do not visit, and what that means for communities) and ongoing research in the fields of education and psychology around lifelong learning and intrinsic motivation.

Parents: Why Visit Museums? A: Mostly For Kids

8/17/2017

 
Picture
This isn't really a surprise, now is it? In my 2017 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers, the  majority of museum-going parents visit museums so that their children have learning opportunities. Overall, it is an extrinsically motivated reason for visiting.

The interesting part is looking at the parents that are intrinsically motivated as well. One doesn't preclude the other, yet look at how few are intrinsically motivated at children's museums and science centers. Only 12%. (And science centers, when I look just at your regular visitors, it only goes up to 18%.)

As I'll lay out in a few weeks, the motivation gap matters. A lot.

Though to be honest, what I'm most curious about is broader population response. They are thinking about all types of museums, not a specific type, and in that context, their response makes a lot of sense; it is almost an average of the responses from my sampling of museum-goers.


A note about fielding research. I hold dear the idea that research for the field, about the field, should be shared with the field. But that only works when museums work together to make it possible. Since individual museums are needed to field this work, the survey also benefits participating museums on an individual level by providing benchmark data on visitation rates, motivations, attitudes and preferences, and demographic questions … all of which can then be tracked over time in the future. Participating museums are also allowed to add 1 - 2 custom questions specific to their needs. 

Which means if you value this research,  want more of it in the coming years, and want to track your own museum's progress over time, please support this work by enrolling your museum in the 2018 Annual Survey of Museum Goers. The fee for 2018 is only $1,000 per museum. 



The questions for this survey have been inspired by ongoing conversations within the museum field (who does/does not go to museums, why they do/do not visit, and what that means for communities) and ongoing research in the fields of education and psychology around lifelong learning and intrinsic motivation. In particular, this question is similar to versions fielded by, among other organizations, the Smithsonian's Office of Policy and Analysis, the Lithuanian Ministry of Culture, Visitors Count!, etc.

Value of Museums, part III: Criticisms

8/15/2017

 
  • "… when a museum only represents one fraction of its community, such as your museum, it is no longer a place of learning. It has become a place that is outdated and irrelevant to the majority of its population."
                                                                                      - 2017 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers respondent

It would be easy to think, after reading thousands of responses about the value of museums from museum-goers in the 2017 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers, that we are doing an amazing job. After all, the museum-goers are our biggest fans. Of course they are likely to say nice things.

Not so fast.

There were responses that were more critical. And that may reflect broader opinion more than we would like.

That's why it is important to flag a few of the more challenging responses, and acknowledge the truth in them. There were not enough for any real analysis, but they are worth my folding into future lines of inquiry as research continues … and your taking to heart as practitioners in the field.

It's race. And colonialism. And white-washing. Our work is being watched, and considered, through many different lenses. In many ways, we fall short …

  • "… once I was in graduate school, I found many museums lacking in the way they dealt with complicated issues such as colonialism and race. … And so we continue to see history, especially, from the same perspective we were taught in our biased and white-washed textbooks."

Of course, some museums are doing great work on decolonization (Abbe Museum) and with social justice (Levine Museum of the New South). The Center for Civil and Human Rights in Atlanta is providing experiences that are deeply powerful (and I'm capturing them among museum-goers in my research, from both whites and people of color).

But let's be honest. These museums are the exception, not the rule. It seems so much easier to keep doing what we've been doing. That, however, is white-washing … and, sadly, what some of our visitors want.

  • "Museums are … not a place to define social justice or to pit one race against another.  It is not a place to settle the world's problems.  It is a place to ENJOY and let others enjoy."    

This comment disturbs me on so many levels. The writer ostensibly want everyone to enjoy, yet we know many do not feel represented in museums. History and humanity is way too complex to leave race out of our museums. I cannot help but wonder, however … how many others feel this way? Or would prefer museums to remain bastions of white privilege? How many will admit it?

And how do we find out individual complex perspectives on social justice in museums? On race? On LGBTQ identity? Who perpetuates racism in their own lives knowingly? Unknowingly? Who pays lip service to wanting equality, but only because they feel they ought to (and in reality, don't care or don't want it)? And how do we, as a field, figure this out?

Because I'll be honest too. I'm pretty scared about digging too deeply into these issues in my work. I'm frightened about what ugliness I might turn up. What we will do with what we learn … or turn our back on as "too hard"? 

And I am downright terrified that, despite good intentions, I'll do or say something offensive (or that I just did in this research release). But I'm taking my own deep breath, and have agreed to join grant proposals that focus on institutionalized racism in the North, LGBTQ history at historic sites, and decolonization. Let's hope these important projects are funded this fall and go forward. Because tackling the hard is important.



A note about fielding research. I hold dear the idea that research for the field, about the field, should be shared with the field. But that only works when museums work together to make it possible. Since individual museums are needed to field this work, the survey also benefits participating museums on an individual level by providing benchmark data on visitation rates, motivations, attitudes and preferences, and demographic questions … all of which can then be tracked over time in the future. Participating museums are also allowed to add 1 - 2 custom questions specific to their needs. 

Which means if you value this research,  want more of it in the coming years, and want to track your own museum's progress over time, please support this work by enrolling your museum in the 2018 Annual Survey of Museum Goers. The fee for 2018 is only $1,000 per museum. 



The questions for this survey have been inspired by ongoing conversations within the museum field (who does/does not go to museums, why they do/do not visit, and what that means for communities) and ongoing research in the fields of education and psychology around lifelong learning and intrinsic motivation.

Q. Why Visit Museums? A. Learning Opportunities for Me.

8/10/2017

 
Picture
When I ask museum-goers why they visit museums, learning comes up fairly often. But for whom is rather important.

In my 2017 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers, the majority of regular visitors to art and history museums are thinking about their own learning opportunities. But less than one in five regular visitors to children's museums or science centers are. The broader public, thinking of museums in general (and if they were to visit one, why), falls in between, at two in five.

Of course, there are lots of reasons for visiting museums. Such as learning opportunities for children ... which is a much stronger motivation for those regular visitors to children's museums and science centers.

But here's the thing. My "why do you visit" question allowed respondents to pick as many choices as they liked. Parents can choose learning for themselves and for their children; one doesn't preclude the other. (There were several other options as well. I'll get to all of them, promise.)

Because that's what driving the difference here. Since the super-majority of regular visitors to children's museums and science centers are parents (primarily of children 10 and younger), we see what I call The Parent Bubble: a large influx of extrinsically-motivated parents who may or may not have any intrinsic motivations for visiting for their own sake.  Now, I love that they are seeing museums as a good thing for their kids, but as we'll see in a few weeks, The Parent Bubble presents a lot of challenges for museums.

One more thing. This question was designed to capture those easy-to-articular reasons for visiting museums. But using this answer as an example, it doesn't tell us why they picked museums over other learning opportunities. That takes deeper probing. More to come.



A note about fielding research. I hold dear the idea that research for the field, about the field, should be shared with the field. But that only works when museums work together to make it possible. Since individual museums are needed to field this work, the survey also benefits participating museums on an individual level by providing benchmark data on visitation rates, motivations, attitudes and preferences, and demographic questions … all of which can then be tracked over time in the future. Participating museums are also allowed to add 1 - 2 custom questions specific to their needs. 

Which means if you value this research,  want more of it in the coming years, and want to track your own museum's progress over time, please support this work by enrolling your museum in the 2018 Annual Survey of Museum Goers. The fee for 2018 is only $1,000 per museum. 



The questions for this survey have been inspired by ongoing conversations within the museum field (who does/does not go to museums, why they do/do not visit, and what that means for communities) and ongoing research in the fields of education and psychology around lifelong learning and intrinsic motivation. In particular, this question is similar to versions fielded by, among other organizations, the Smithsonian's Office of Policy and Analysis, the Lithuanian Ministry of Culture, Visitors Count!, etc.

Motivations and the Value of Museums: Radical Differences (part II of The Value of Museums)

8/7/2017

 
A museum's ability to affect someone in a meaningful way is closely tied to that individual's willingness to learn … and openness to new ideas and concepts.

That's a complicated statement. Allow me to repeat it.

A museum's ability to affect someone in a meaningful way is closely tied to that individual's willingness to learn … and openness to new ideas and concepts.

It's about mindset. And it means that the impact of museums disproportionately affects some visitors more than others.

Over the past few weeks, I've shared some findings from the 2017 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers about intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivations in museum-going. But how does that affect impact?

When I asked museum-goers to share with me their assessment of the value of museums in their life, there were clear differences based on their motivations around learning.


Intrinsically motivated museum-goers

These avid museum-goers were much more likely to share impacts that were about the societal benefits of museums. That is, they spoke often about minds being opened, connections engendered, understanding developed, and how museums contribute significantly to a sense of place. Overall, their comments were richer and more detailed, with more nuance and emotion.

They also spoke of personal benefits, and were about twice as likely to say museums made them more curious, enriched them, or were good for their mental health. Additionally, many made general statements about museums. In both cases, these types of answers were more likely to be in addition to the societal benefits.

Two randomly selected examples:
  • "They have helped me understand other cultures; allowed me to experience beauty in many forms; broadened my world view; and taught me much about life- now and in the past."
  • "Museums give you a sense of both continuities and changes over time.  They open your mind to endless contemplation of all the relationships, both within a given period between various aspects of each culture, and between cultures and over time. Connecting and patterns in material culture, economics, environment, science and politics and how each influences the others is the most rewarding kind of learning and museums do that best."


Extrinsically motivated museum-goers

First, extrinsically-motivated museum-goers were more likely to skip my question entirely. Response rates fell from 72% of intrinsically-motivated museum-goers to only 57% of the most extrinsically motivated.  Fewer of them were able to comment in the first place, which is telling.

When it came to those who did respond, there were two areas where they particularly stood out.

1 - They were about 60% more likely to focus on museums being beneficial to their children. (Note: I distinguished between those who said museums benefit all children, a societal benefit, from those who said museums benefited their children, a personal benefit.) That means parents responding to the survey are disproportionately extrinsically motivated (something you'll hear a lot more about soon). Randomly selected example of this type of comment:
  • "I went often as a child to museums and zoos and now I seek those same opportunities for my children."
2 - They were about a third more likely to mention museums as merely places of learning, without any kind of context for why that mattered (that is, no personal or societal benefit). Randomly selected example of this type of comment:
  • "Yes, I've learned many things in/from museums that I would have never learned from school, TV, books."
Given their extrinsic motivations around learning, which is learning to meet a personal need, it isn't a surprise that their responses reflected those needs.  And, indeed, I would argue that I'm thrilled that parents and caregivers choose to visit museums to benefit their children, or that some museum-goers value the education provided in museums (even if they don't articulate why that learning has mattered to them). They are visiting museums, and that's the most important thing.


Extending meaning-making to all audiences

Deeply meaningful, powerful, even transformative experiences in museums are more likely to happen to those who are intrinsically motivated. This is clear from the types of experiences they have had in museums, and it is also clear from the impact they have derived from those experiences. It is also clear from their mindset, as they typically approach museums with an openness to change, or transformation:

  • "At any age even when revisiting an exhibit be it in an art, or history or science museum each time I approach the exhibit I get a fresh perspective that speaks to me to tell me how much I've changed as a human being. When approached from this perspective the experience becomes a dialog rather than a static clinical exhibition."

​But therein lies a challenge, as it means that we are disproportionately affecting the faithful: the minority of visitors that are intrinsically motivated.

Yet I see this as an opportunity: there is a pretty significant captive audience in our museums, every day, that we can reach.

It's not going to be easy.  After all, what we want to deliver doesn't match up with the actual, most pressing needs of these visitors. A parent or caregiver visiting for their child's enrichment isn't coming in with the mindset that they may have a transformative experience themselves … therefore, they are less likely to.

There is also something else, which you may have ascertained as you read this: life stage matters. It matters a lot. So does socio-economic status, educational attainment, age, and other factors. I have two more research releases on the value of museums, but after that, I'll begin exploring different segments of museum-goers through life stage and demographic lenses. Those lenses will give much more depth and complexity to individual motivations, and the value of museums. They will also give us a better sense of how to measure impact and articulate our value to broader audiences … and attract new audiences along the way by better matching our marketing to their explicit, extrinsic needs.




A note about fielding research. I hold dear the idea that research for the field, about the field, should be shared with the field. But that only works when museums work together to make it possible. Since individual museums are needed to field this work, the survey also benefits participating museums on an individual level by providing benchmark data on visitation rates, motivations, attitudes and preferences, and demographic questions … all of which can then be tracked over time in the future. Participating museums are also allowed to add 1 - 2 custom questions specific to their needs. 

Which means if you value this research,  want more of it in the coming years, and want to track your own museum's progress over time, please support this work by enrolling your museum in the 2018 Annual Survey of Museum Goers. The fee for 2018 is only $1,000 per museum. 


The questions for this survey have been inspired by ongoing conversations within the museum field (who does/does not go to museums, why they do/do not visit, and what that means for communities) and ongoing research in the fields of education and psychology around lifelong learning and intrinsic motivation. 

Year One: By the numbers

8/3/2017

 
Picture

The Value of Museums: Initial Findings, part 1

8/1/2017

 
  • "The Museum of Natural History in Milwaukee, WI.  I was 12 years old and felt so alive and happy to see the 'real' things I'd been reading about and studying (objects from Egypt come to mind), that I KNEW I was a scholar and a traveler even though I was from a poor family.  I promised myself then and there that I'd get to Egypt and to England to see the Rosetta Stone.  I've been to both places numerous times, and of course, many others as well.  That visit as a 12-year-old made me see much more was possible for me in my life than staying in WI and being a homemaker (this was my destiny in my family).  From that day on I was college-bound so I could expand my views of the world.  I went on to earn two master's degrees … This is why I know museums are a NECESSITY for humanity." - survey respondent, 2017 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers

Impact. We all hope that museums have impact. We think they do. After all, they did for us.

But what about everyone else? How do we measure our impact? How do we do so in ways that make sense? Stand up to scrutiny? Especially since we don't know who has visited what museum, visitation can be sporadic, and so on.

As a field, I feel like we have been wringing our hands, and talking in circles, about this forever.

So I asked. In the 2017 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers, I simply asked respondents to reflect upon the role of museums in their lives, and share if those visits had any impact on them … or not.

And they shared. My goodness, did they share. The responses were amazing … and anything but simple.

  • " … it is at the intersection of museums and the public that all the 'isms can stop - it is in museums that we are inspired, reflective, and most deeply thoughtful about the human condition of which we are a part and in which we play a unique role. Museums are a mirror of who we are and who we can be, constructively and destructively. They humble us."

But before we dig into them, I do have to share a major caveat: these are regular museum-goers. Of course they are going to be more likely to articulate, and share, positive thoughts on impact than a casual museum-goer, or a non-visitor. These findings should not be taken as universal perceptions, but instead initial themes that we should then figure out ways to test more broadly (and strive to make more common).

Additionally, as you'll see in my next research release, being a regular museum-goer doesn't mean one actually has a meaningful relationship with museums … or a relationship that couldn't be easily replaced by something else. Indeed, one's motivation to learn, whether intrinsic or extrinsic, seems to matter. A lot.

Let's look at the overall results first, however. Responses fell into three broad categories (which add up to more than 100%, since 22% of responses fell into both of the first two categories; 10% of responses fell into none of these categories):

  • The societal benefits of museums: 49% of respondents. Generally, the deepest responses. Types of responses include:
    • Having horizons or perspectives broadened, a mind expanded. (May seem like a personal benefit, but as it affects how an individual interacts with others, that means there are societal benefit as well.)
    • Having a greater awareness of others, more understanding, a sense of empathy, in ways that have changed them, or their thinking.
    • Development of sense of place, that museums contribute to what makes a place unique, and tells us what a community values.
    • Museums are a connective force, connecting us to place, history, and people.
    • An explicit assertion that communities and/or society needs museums.
    • Examples:
      • "Museums are the glue that holds together families, culture, and communities."
      • "They have inspired me to think about people - society - and man's roles, responsibilities, and opportunities in this world  Also, going to museums has broadened my perspective and introduced me to things I would never have seen - which leads me to grow as a person and connect to other people as a human being."
      • "Ideally, museums take you out of yourself and into a form of communion with other minds, other cultures, other times. In some ways the 'learning' that goes with this is almost beside the point. Empathy is a great gift."
 
  • The personal benefits of museums: 47% of respondents. Types of responses suggest that museums:
    • Are important for (their) children/help them raise their children (largely because of education);
    • Have helped develop a specific interest;
    • Spark curiosity and/or a love of learning;
    • Enrich/stimulate/improve quality of life;
    • Are places that inspire, provide a sense of wonder, cultivate creativity;
    • Make them "better," improve personal development, make them well-rounded;
    • Are necessary for mental health, respite, or for their souls.
    • Examples:
      • "As a homeschooling mom, all types of museums are critical in teaching our children."
      • "Yes, I would say that museums have impacted my development as a person.   Museums have sparked many interests and possibilities that I didn't realize …"
      • "hugely important... inspiration for everything in life... thinking in color"
 
  • Comments that were more statements about museums (and provided no commentary on benefits of these things, so did not fall into the above categories): 16% of respondents. Types of responses include:
    • Learning. Or, at least, those who said learning and did not also say why the learning mattered;
    • Unique experiences; that museums do something no one else does;
    • That the respondent had visited since childhood … but no indication of why they mattered except as places of learning.
    • Examples:
      • "To learn."
      • "A place to learn, especially about the past.  And, to help dive into topics that school does not go into great detail about."
      • "My mom always took us to museums to learn about arts and history and science."


But this is just the superficial analysis (though I shudder to say that, because hand-coding thousands of these comments was hard, painstaking, work taking a great deal of discernment). Turns out, how different segments of museum-goers responded mattered quite a bit. Things get interesting, and complicated, when we look at the data through different lenses.

In my next research release, I'll explore differences in responses based on intrinsic or extrinsic motivations around learning. You'll also see me come back to these responses in the coming weeks, when I examine three different segments of museum-goers in more detail (and how their responses differ).




A note about fielding research. I hold dear the idea that research for the field, about the field, should be shared with the field. But that only works when museums work together to make it possible. Since individual museums are needed to field this work, the survey also benefits participating museums on an individual level by providing benchmark data on visitation rates, motivations, attitudes and preferences, and demographic questions … all of which can then be tracked over time in the future. Participating museums are also allowed to add 1 - 2 custom questions specific to their needs. 

Which means if you value this research,  want more of it in the coming years, and want to track your own museum's progress over time, please support this work by enrolling your museum in the 2018 Annual Survey of Museum Goers. The fee for 2018 is only $1,000 per museum. 

The questions for this survey have been inspired by ongoing conversations within the museum field (who does/does not go to museums, why they do/do not visit, and what that means for communities) and ongoing research in the fields of education and psychology around lifelong learning and intrinsic motivation.

    Categories

    All
    2017 Annual Survey
    2018 Annual Survey
    2019 Annual Survey
    2020 Annual Survey
    About
    Broader Population Sampling
    Childhood
    Community Engagement
    COVID 19 Response
    COVID-19 Response
    Demographics
    Impact
    Inclusion
    Leisure Time
    Motivations
    Parents
    Philanthropy
    Young Adults

    Archives

    May 2020
    April 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016

Copyright © 2022 - Wilkening Consulting, LLC
I respectfully acknowledge that I live and work on the lands of the Duwamish people, whose ancestors have lived here for generations. I thank them for their ongoing care of this land, and I endeavor to help museums bring forward a more complete and inclusive history and culture in their work.